by APM Research Lab staff | originally published Dec. 1, 2021; updated Jan. 17, 2022
Among the key findings from our Minnesota’s Diverse Communities Survey is that racial and ethnic discrimination is common in Minnesota, matching—and often exceeding—levels measured in an earlier national survey.
We’ve asked several thought-leaders and researchers to serve as an online response panel to help digest these findings, including offering their ideas for how the state might respond.
We hope you appreciate their insights as much as we do. We also welcome your responses: please connect with us on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram, or send us your thoughts at info@apmresearchlab.org.
Responses below are the opinions of the authors. Appearing here does not imply endorsement by the APM Research Lab. Responses have been lightly edited for clarity and length.
Jump to response from:
Anton Treuer, Ph.D., Professor of Ojibwe at Bemidji State University and author of many books
Cynthia J. Fraction, Director, Center for Social Justice Research, Policy & Advocacy at the Twin Cities Urban League
Ramona Kitto Stately (Santee Dakota Nation), Project Director, We Are Still Here Minnesota
Steve Thao, Executive Director, CHAT (Center for Hmong Arts and Talent)
Pearl Walker-Swaney, MPH (Standing Rock Sioux Tribe/White Earth Nation), Program Manager, Native Governance Center
Allison Liuzzi, Research Manager and Minnesota Compass Project Director, Wilder Research
Robyn Rapoport, Executive Vice President for Health Care, Public Policy and International Research, SSRS
Rodolfo Gutierrez, Executive Director, HACER (Hispanic Advocacy and Community Empowerment through Research)
Why do you think racial and ethnic discrimination is as common as it is in Minnesota today?
Talking about race is difficult. I have a YouTube short film that highlights my views on why this is a tough discussion here.
Minnesota was home to George Floyd and Philando Castile. It is home to an Indigenous population that comprises 2% of the state's demography but 17% of the state's prison population and 20% of the state's homeless population. In Minnesota, we are nice and can talk about tater tot hotdish and weather at great length and detail. But we are so conflict averse that we are communication averse. We don't often make space for tackling tough topics.
Minnesota is politically a purple state and these are divisive times to tackle a sometimes-divisive subject. But that is precisely why we need to lean in. Every oppression in history was orchestrated by people who thought they were kind and moral and right. So we need to be introspective as we search for solutions. We should all seek to interrogate our own beliefs and prejudices, to give everyone we want to give a good talking-to a good listening-to.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
Minnesota needs a truth and reconciliation effort. We need broad, deep, sustained communication on this topic and not just in echo chambers. I believe we need this at a national level and at a state level. We need to mobilize resources to support and amplify this effort.
We need education on tough topics for all of us. We need to get brave and lean in. Minnesotans who care about this need to communicate with one another more and more deeply as well, to hold one another up—to be proactive in activism, not just reactive to each new crisis. When we build bridges like that, real change will happen.
Why do you think racial and ethnic discrimination is as common as it is in Minnesota today?
In 2013 three Black women, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, created a movement building, Black-centered, politically focused, social media project called #BlackLivesMatter. It launched and took off after the acquittal of George Zimmerman, a man who fatally shot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, in February of 2012. Today, Black Lives Matter signs are seen on lawns, billboards, store fronts, churches, websites, and the like throughout the nation.
However, on Tuesday April 20, 2021, Minnesota took this Movement to the next level. When the word “GUILTY” flashed before our screens we all watched, now, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin handcuffed and ushered away to a place where people go when they have committed a crime. Convicted of second- and third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter for the blatant killing of George Floyd, it was at this time that Minnesota paused and let the world know that before Black life can matter to anyone, Black life must first be valued by everyone and that this must reflect in our laws and actions with all persons being held accountable.
Stanford Psychologist Steven O. Roberts and Michael Rizzo, postdoctoral fellow at NYU co-authored a study that discusses the 7 factors that allow racism to exist.
Categories: which organize people into distinct groups;
Factions: which trigger ingroup loyalty and inter group competition;
Segregation: which hardens racist perceptions, preferences and beliefs;
Hierarchy: which emboldens people to think, feel and behave in racist ways;
Power: which legislates racism on both micro and macro levels;
Media: which legitimizes overrepresented and idealized representations of white Americans while marginalizing and minimizing people of color; and
Passivism: such that overlooking or denying the existence of racism encourages others to do the same.
Of the seven factors the most insidious is passivism or passive racism, which is inclusive of apathy toward systems of racial advantage or denial that those systems even exist. Minnesota is known to be a state whose racism is passive or covert or even subtle at times, which to many is worse than blatant. While the seven categories are not specific only to Minnesota, they certainly underscore how racial and ethnic discrimination are common in Minnesota.
Racial and ethnic discrimination in Minnesota is common today for three reasons. First, Black lives are not equally valued, and, for Black lives to matter they must first be valued. The difference being asserting appropriate action and being accountable to it versus just placing words on a front lawn, a t-shirt, or face mask. Do you model what you say and how so? What is the measurable action that takes place?
Second, the laws of the state and those laws that make up the U.S. Constitution were not written by racially diverse people and therefore they were not meant to be inclusive of all people. This helps to fuel racial and ethnic discrimination when laws don’t work fairly. It is as if different shapes exist but there is only one hole, and it accepts only one shape and therefore what to do with the other shapes that are not designed to fit into the existing system? Only those in power get to answer that question. Power, or point #5, comes into play.
Last, as long as white privilege exists, racism has an open door to be practiced hence racial and ethnic discrimination will remain a constant until this construct can be interrupted. Obviously, education is key in the lives of all people. Knowledge is a rich and powerful tool. What is in one’s head cannot be taken away. However, how to take the knowledge and learned behavior of racism and the idea of the practices of ethnic discrimination out of the mind of a racist?
These are Minnesota’s uphill battles, I believe, with racial and ethnic discrimination is as common in Minnesota today. Minnesota has moved the needle but we have a long way to go before the song is over.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
A restorative justice process is needed. White people and African Americans need to come together and hear each other. We have unfinished business from a local and national perspective. The Civil Rights Movement has not ended. It has taken a different twist. If Minnesota can find a way to begin the healing process between the two races, history will be made. This is a critical step towards eliminating discrimination in Minnesota.
Anywhere there are laws, policies and acts where people are held accountable and repercussions can take place, all should be reviewed and rewritten to reflect today’s racial and ethnic composition of the state of Minnesota. Tedious though it may be, Minnesota, has reached a point where it is being forced to initiate bold moves to address laws and policies that reflect all representation.
In order to do this, every law and policy must be written or rewritten by diverse people. No longer can laws be used that were written by and for white males where today they are tweaked and amended. People who make up the composition of this state must be at the table as they are now stakeholders. Every law must be revisited. We can’t stomp out discrimination if representation of stakeholders are not at the table. This is also inclusive of the U.S. Constitution. This breaks down the power dimension noted in point #5, above.
We are a state with high numbers of immigrant populations and we are growing. While the growth in population and diversity is a beautiful thing, the concept of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) or inclusive excellence is a failed concept in businesses across the state. These are mere words on paper, statements that are not action oriented. DEI is a creative way of lumping distinct groups (point #1 above) together to make it easier for businesses of all natures to check boxes in an aggregate way for reporting. This must stop. DEI creatively waters down and minimizes the races and makes companies just that much more vulnerable to discrimination.
Where there are DEI plans, if they must exist, I propose that there be advisory boards comprised of people who represent populations vulnerable to discrimination. Regular feedback, evaluations, in ways that hold organizations and leadership at all levels accountable is required. Senior management should be accountable to this advisory board.
Learn more about Ms. Fraction’s work at the Twin Cities Urban League.
Why do you think racial and ethnic discrimination is as common as it is in Minnesota today?
These surveys and their results are not surprising to those who live these experiences every day. I live in a state where Indigenous students have consistently failed for 50 years. Today, this data reflects Black, Brown and Indigenous students. This is no anomaly, this is a complete failure of an education system to meet the needs of those who are diverse learners. The resounding message is “they don’t matter.” I agree with one of the survey’s respondents, who commented that the one thing that could change discrimination in our state is education. We must teach the whole history, not a history written by white men from a colonialistic lens. How can we expect to raise good critical thinkers, and prepare them for future leadership without arming them with all of the state’s history, be it good, bad or ugly?
The landmark, national Reclaiming Native Truth research report in 2018 showed that half of all adult Americans believe that the information which they were taught about Native American history and culture in school is inaccurate. It also reveals that 72% of Americans believe that it is necessary to improve school curriculum about Native American subjects. Moreover, this research project revealed that teachers in general believe that Native history is among the worst covered and least accurate subjects taught in public education today.
The data shows that in the area of Education, 23 states do not mention Native Americans and of the States that do, they don’t teach about Native Americans after 1900. Imagine the message this sends to a developing child in a classroom: There are no more Indians, they don’t matter. For the Black, Brown and Indigenous child in a classroom, they are deemed invisible. For all children in a classroom there is a very strong message, being white is important.
White children learn early that “my teacher looks like me, my identity is consistently reinforced in the lessons I learn, the heroes I learn about look like me, all the leadership look like me and the books I read reflect people like me.” This is clinched with Manifest Destiny lessons in the 5th grade. This is where the gap in the educational system begins and remains consistent through disciplinary measures that are unfair. More importantly, this is where the racist system is fostered and reinforced.
Those who resist teaching a more accurate history are the products of it. And while we wait, each Black, Brown and Indigenous child will bear the shame of the ignorance perpetrated within the education system.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
The first steps to healing is to acknowledge what happened and support new laws, systems and community voices to enact systemic change. And I say “healing” because our own Legislature has declared racism as a public health crisis. We, as Minnesotans, must decide who we want to be. Do we continue to fertilize the racist systems, and allow our BIPOC children to carry the burden? Are we satisfied with the Minnesota Paradox or do we check our egos, roll up our sleeves and live up to the mission statements that resound in our school districts across the state that vow to teach all children knowing full well that some will predictably fail.
We Are Still Here Minnesota’s mission is to spotlight and make visible the lives and contributions of Native American peoples and their governments in Minnesota today because we are still here. We do this by challenging and correcting false narratives, replacing fiction with facts in K-12 education and finding solutions for issues impacting the Native American community. We braid together the strengths of established networks of Native American people, allies and organizations focusing on the areas of Governance & Policy, K-12 Education, Pop Culture & Media and Philanthropy to uplift our tribal nations, our history and citizens. Without using all of these networks, it is clear that we cannot influence change in a system that has changed very little in the last 100 years.
We Are Still Here Minnesota will continue to support Indigenous Education for All legislation, which will give teachers the tools to include Ojibwe and Dakota History and Culture in all disciplines and meet the requirements of their licensure. We will continue to ensure that our tribal nations are seen as contemporary people who have suffered genocidal tactics and land theft, yet we are still here. 159 years of oppression does not define who we are. 14,000 years of connection to place brings cultural understandings of ways of healing and knowing. The Minnesota Tribal Gaming Association, which includes all 11 tribal nations in our state, are the 14th largest employers in Minnesota and the 2nd largest tourism draw. The economic contribution alone of our Tribal Nations are of huge benefit to Minnesota, yet we remain invisible.
We are ancient, and we are contemporary.
Learn more about Ms. Kitto-Stately’s work at We Are Still Here Minnesota.
Why do you think racial and ethnic discrimination is as common as it is in Minnesota today?
Minnesota Nice is a cultural identity and even though the connotation is positive, many (non Native Minnesotan) people have come to understand it as a polite and nicety that the majority of the white population creates that hides their true feelings. While there is legal acceptance of different races and ethnicities there is a big disconnect between tolerating and truly accepting immigrants and people of color into the fabric of Minnesota society. A number of personalities on a local popular radio station often talks about “one of us” and that segregation is seen everyday between White Minnesotans and immigrants and people of color.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
Discrimination will not be eliminated soon. By law everyone should be treated equally but in truth and in the minds of White Minnesota, there will never be a state of true equality. There will never be a state of true equality in terms of partner selections, in terms of truly accepting of other people and their cultural differences. People of color are allowed to go to the dance. But in truth they will rarely be asked to dance.
What CHAT (Center for Hmong Arts and Talent) does is to share our culture with different cultures. We share our Hmong songs and culture with White Minnesotans to lesson the exoticism and to personalize who we are. We hope that by understanding there will soon be acceptance.
There can always be policy to level the field and strive for equality but the hearts and minds of people and their inner thoughts are the true barometers of racism and equality discussion. That is one way you end racism—perhaps have our education system embrace a major strategy from K-12 and have that value be integrated into curriculum. Get them young. Racism is taught and acquired by culture and parents.
To this day I still remember Native stories and fables from second grade which provided me an interest and compassion to the people who lived here before everyone else.
Why do you think racial and ethnic discrimination is as common as it is in Minnesota today?
Many people consider Minnesota to be a “progressive” state and a “nice” place to live. But those labels don’t reflect reality, and the data show this. Racial and ethnic discrimination is common in Minnesota because our political representatives, citizens and institutions regularly uphold white supremacist systems, negatively impacting and diminishing quality of life for BIPOC communities.
The ongoing impacts of colonization, genocide and slavery lie at the root of discrimination faced by BIPOC communities. Individuals who hold power on issues that matter to BIPOC communities often do not represent these communities and operate with a colonized mindset. BIPOC communities have made tremendous contributions to Minnesota, but their assets usually go unrecognized. Most often, power holders extract beauty from BIPOC communities and use it for profit without providing credit or compensation. Cultural appropriation, microaggressions, harassment and hate crimes against BIPOC run rampant in our state.
When systems perpetuate harmful narratives about BIPOC communities, racial discrimination becomes the norm. I grew up in northern Minnesota. As one of the few Indigenous student-athletes on the field, I encountered racial slurs and harassment from non-Indigenous peers and teachers simply because I have brown skin. I experienced microaggressions about my long hair, a symbol of connection and health in my culture that others openly despised. In a history class, we skipped discussing American Indian history; when I asked about it, my teacher told me we would come back to it. We never did. These are the norms I witnessed (and continue to witness) as a Minnesotan.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
Reducing racial discrimination in Minnesota will require policy change and societal shifts to collectively dismantle white supremacy. For example, we need curriculum changes to ensure that Minnesota students learn the true history of Mni Sota Makoce, no matter how uncomfortable or dark it may be.
Our educational curriculums exclude modern-day Indigenous voices and portray Indigenous people as relics of the past. This leads to invisibility and damaging myths. Cultural enrichment and learning about modern-day Indigenous issues are paramount for students. These changes will require training, resources and social-emotional learning for educators and parents. We need narrative change in our schools to accurately portray and uplift BIPOC communities.
Our state representatives need to learn about the 11 Native nations in Minnesota, along with the histories and cultures of BIPOC communities that call our state home. In 2019, the Minnesota state legislature took a positive step in this direction by meeting with elected Tribal leaders for Sovereignty Day. Minnesota also has a Tribal-State Relations training that builds relationships between state and Tribal governments. We need more initiatives that promote the exchange of knowledge between BIPOC leaders and state representatives.
Individual Minnesotans should do self-work on antiracism, decolonization, and moving away from white supremacist systems. We recommend Me and White Supremacy by Layla Saad as a starting point for this work. My organization, Native Governance Center, has developed several resources to help people navigate issues like cultural appropriation and moving beyond land acknowledgment.
Learn more about Ms. Walker-Swaney’s work at the Native Governance Center.
As a researcher who has long tracked disparities in Minnesota, what do you see as notable about the findings from the Minnesota’s Diverse Communities Survey?
We know from data on Minnesota Compass that our state is home to longstanding, stubborn disparities by race and ethnicity. Findings from Minnesota’s Diverse Communities Survey cast additional light on the various forms of discrimination perceived and experienced by our Black, Indigenous, Latinx and Asian communities. The findings are sobering. And not unexpected. Discrimination may, in fact, be worse in Minnesota than nationally.
Perceptions of discrimination are particularly pronounced in employment. Across BIPOC communities, at least 7 in 10 adults believe members of their racial or ethnic community experience employment discrimination when applying for jobs. Estimates are closer to 9 in 10 adults among Minnesota’s Black and Indigenous populations. And across these communities, perceptions of discrimination are consistently higher than nationally. This is striking and, whether perceived or real, could have long-lasting impacts on all Minnesotans’ economic well-being.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
Racial and ethnic disparities in Minnesota are large and persistent. But there are ways to change ourselves, our organizations and our systems that can result in greater well-being for all Minnesotans. On Minnesota Compass, our Racial Equity Resource Directory provides a robust list of racial equity programs and training providers that can help their organizations combat racism and increase cultural competence. Our Leadership Toolkit offers a list of 23 best practices in diversity, equity and inclusion that show what works (and what – surprisingly – doesn’t). Acting in ways that create small and large disruptions to the status quo can result in the changes we need to see to address real and perceived employment, policing, and housing discrimination.
BACK TO TOP▲
Editor’s note: SSRS is the survey research firm that conducted the Minnesota’s Diverse Communities Survey on behalf of the APM Research Lab, as well as the 2017 Discrimination in America Survey on behalf of National Public Radio, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The questions on discrimination in the Minnesota survey are replicated from the earlier national survey.
How do the findings from the national and Minnesota surveys compare? What should we bear in mind from a research perspective?
The 2021 Minnesota survey, like the 2017 national survey, points to a pattern of discrimination experienced by Black, Indigenous, Latinx and Asians at significantly higher levels compared with Whites. The 2021 Minnesota survey highlights the diversity of experiences across these populations, underscoring the need to better understand interactions between region and identity.
As a researcher, however, a key question in reviewing the findings is to what extent data from 2017 and 2021 are comparable. In this regard, there are a few things to weigh. As noted in the article, differences may be attributable to “a heightened awareness of racial issues” over the four years between the two studies. Further, the difference in mode of administration between the two surveys is important to consider. In a landmark comparison of mode of interview effects, the Pew Research Center pointed to a 15 percentage point difference between phone and web among Black respondents saying they face “a lot” of discrimination (71% vs. 86%).
Another important consideration is the placement of the questions in the two surveys. In the 2017 survey, the questions being compared are the first substantive questions asked of respondents. In contrast, the same questions are asked at about the halfway point in the 2021 survey, following other questions concerning race that may have influenced their responses to the comparable questions. These differences suggest exercising some caution vis-à-vis the assertion that discrimination appears more common in Minnesota than nationally, based on comparisons between the two surveys.
What else did you learn from the survey? And what does that suggest for future research?
At SSRS, we are proud to have partnered with APM and Harvard/RWJF/NPR to conduct these important and informative studies. As a researcher, I am always motivated to look closely at the data. In reviewing responses to the 2021 survey in light of high levels of discrimination experienced by Black, Indigenous, Latinx and Asian Minnesotans, I’m struck by similar responses across most groups to the question asking respondents when they think about Minnesota are they generally hopeful or fearful about the future, with seven in ten or more in all groups (other than Hmong) saying they are generally hopeful.
Further, the 2021 survey included several open-ended questions, including one asking respondents to share additional thoughts on the topics covered by the survey. Responses to these questions offer an opportunity to both see the diversity of experiences (e.g., a Hmong respondent who experienced racial profiling when they were younger and more recently had multiple interactions where police were courteous and professional) and identify ways questions can be improved for the future.
For example, some white respondents indicated they experienced preferential discrimination in some contexts and suggested this may have led to measurement error in the data. In addition, several respondents identified questions and foci to consider in future research (e.g., asking where in Minnesota people have experienced discrimination in the past, or asking questions that would explore the effects of gun violence in their neighborhood).
The 2021 Minnesota survey, similar to the 2017 survey, provides rich data for deeper consideration about where different populations are aligned, as well as grounds for exploring opportunities for deeper learnings in the future.
BACK TO TOP▲
Why do you think racial and ethnic discrimination is as common as it is in Minnesota today?
Minnesota is still one of the states with the highest proportion of the population being white. As such, the self-identification in a diverse community has taken longer than in other states in the country. There are still towns where the presence of people of color is extraordinary, eventual, and non-permanent, and some other places where diversity is completely nonexistent. With that in mind, the educational process to become more inclusive, has not taken place broadly, and for many the persistence of the slogan of “Minnesota Nice”, and other stereotypical labels, tend to “justify” or minimize the lack of recognition of the diversity of population that it is growing. And then, with the emergence of more and more visible groups of diverse people in the state, the sense of menace grows, and activates the “protective” activity in front of the “others”, the non-whites, who seem to be bringing some danger to the status quo.
The Midwest is also a factor, as Minnesota shares great plains and well cemented farming sector in the economy, where the conservatism is strong, and promotes and applaud actions with clear sense of discrimination over other diverse people. And, even though the metro areas are becoming attractive to progressive views who move to the state, as it happens in the Dakotas, Iowa, and Wisconsin.
The state of Minnesota is not only less diverse than many of other states in the country, but also has arrived late to the process of diversification in several areas, from which many believed were apart for much longer time than what we are seeing today. Great migratory flows, from Florida and St. Louis, as well as from Texas and California, had brought unexpected numbers of Black and Hispanic population, to whom refugees and other immigrant join. That happened in a brief period, which caused disconcert among many in the mainstream, and provoked unthinkable experiences. Minnesota was not ready to transit to a more diverse demographic profile and have confronted misconceptions that have fed discriminatory practices everywhere, especially against people of color. Situations that, as it can be seen in the survey, are hard to recognize from those who have the privilege of being white, and obvious for the rest of the population in the state who are victims of discrimination.
The data collected reflects much of what HACER has found along the research projects we have conducted in Minnesota. Today, when the estimated number of Hispanics that was going to be reached by 2050, has been reached in 2020. We see no more that old lady in the line to pay at Target, touching my shoulder and asking what language I was talking with my wife. We were just arrived to Minnesota, 24 years ago. Today, that same lady would complain of “so many Mexicans in the story,” who speak a non-comprehensible language, which to her eyes “shows” that they are unable to learn a “civilized” language, and have not understood they must speak in English while living in the US. That same lady now might get surprised when those “Mexicans” respond to her in perfect English, which is their first language as they were born in the US. The lady who moved from being “Minnesota Nice” (curious, courteous, and interested in others, while not noticing that she was micro-aggressing those strangers). That very same lady might today openly expresses her discomfort for seeing so much diversity surrounding her.
What do you think should be done about discrimination in Minnesota?
There is still too much to do about discrimination in Minnesota. It is not enough that several state offices are now recognizing the need of becoming more inclusive. As we can testify, when coming to the offices of local and state agencies, although more diverse people are now employed there, the access to services provided by the same agencies are not yet reaching most of the communities of color in the state. The information is not flowing and not reaching them, or when that happens, it is not tailored to be culturally acceptable. All those processes are being lost in translation, which is usually done just directly from the original texts, and even with the use of google tools, that are completely inaccurate, and lacking elements that could be seen as universally applicable to all cultures.
The lack of sensitivity towards education and perceptions based on different cultural backgrounds, should be recognized and addressed. That cannot happen with the implementation of any policy, if it is not accompanied by a continuous process of education that includes public servants, administrative workers, teachers, and any other authorities in the arena.
Minnesota must learn that it is not enough anymore to be “nice.” The concept of nice means different things to different people. The people of Minnesota must start recognizing that discrimination and abuse based on ethnic, racial, and cultural differences occurs daily and everywhere. Then, we must be ready and prepared to embrace the need for change, and finally work altogether towards the construction of a more inclusive and nondiscriminatory in practice society.
Currently, HACER works in collaboration with other organizations in the state that serve other communities of color, with the goal of identifying common issues and solutions and to generate stronger statements towards governmental institutions. The growing diverse communities in the state must be included, without any other sense than the improvement of everybody’s lives—this will finally make of the state the nicest one. We are doing this work in collaboration with 39 different and diverse organizations statewide, and under the leadership of The Diversity Council in Rochester, Asian Media Access, and HACER in the Twin Cities. Our project, Project Healings, takes the disparities over COVID-19 vaccine access for our communities of color in the state, to generate actions and activities from the community base to promote the change.
HACER is also collaborating with the Minnesota Department of Health, CDC Foundation and other local health care agencies, to bring resources and information to our diverse communities, including all health-related resources, as well as economic support, housing, and many other important elements where discrimination must end, to guarantee equal access to all.
We are also conducting couple of research projects, focusing on better understanding the gaps in access to resources from business owners and artists of Latino/Hispanic origins. Using oral history methodology and other qualitative techniques, we look to document the perception that these communities have in front of the many barriers to doing better in the state. The Minnesota Historical Society and the Minnesota Arts Board support this initiative.
Both examples are listed as something that could and must happen more often: local offices partnering with organizations that work with diverse communities to better inform what is needed to create collaborative venues to solve those problems.